These are external links and will open in a new window
Anne Rucchetto, 27, is a writer living in Toronto, Canada. As part of the BBCs 100 Women series, she writes about why it matters who picks up the bill.
When I first began dating, my mother warned me that there was no such thing as a free drink.
She would elaborate gravely: Men will think you owe them something.
I know my mother didnt mean to fill me with dread, but her statement left me troubled each time I met someone new. It took me time to relinquish the sense of obligation I felt to men who covered the cost of my $5 beer – but since then, Ive never looked back.
As someone whos been dating since the age of 14, Ive spent a lot of time thinking and talking about ways to find a great partner, as well as what behaviours to look for when meeting someone for the first time.
These days finding a date is easier than ever, with apps and online communities for people of every conceivable orientation, identity, and background.
But who should pay for the first date always sparks a spirited conversation.
I used to embrace the logic that for women to be treated as equal to men, we should pay for our own share, and split the bill with our date. To make sure thats never a problem, Ive always suggested affordable dating venues – cheap and cheerful restaurants, dive bars, gigs, parks.
About five years ago my friends and teachers introduced me to ideas that made me question that approach.
I became aware of feminist writers like Gloria Jean Watkins (known by her pen name bell hooks) who made me think about who benefits most from the current structure of society. She and others got me thinking about the way power functions at the every level, including small individual exchanges.
People benefit differently based on the current structure of society, so depending on who were spending time with, it shouldnt be expected for both parties to pay equal amounts.
Women, on average, earn less than men.Canadian women, on average, earn C$0.69 for every dollar a man makesat work.
This doesnt mean that our cost of living is cheaper – in many cases, it can be more expensive.
Expectations around womens appearances and behaviour have material and personal costs. Womens physical appearances are held to impossibly high standards and a routine subject of ridicule everywhere from the entertainment industry to The White House.
We are expected to be calmer, more attentive, understanding, flexible, and accommodating than men in every area of our lives – in family, work, relationships, and friendships. Meeting these norms is costly – materially and emotionally.
Furthermore, who pays cannot be reduced to an issue of men versus women. We all have different experiences based on our gender, social and economic status, race, citizenship, and more.
Ultimately, equality is not the same as equity. Equality is everyone getting the exact same pair of shoes. Equity is everyone getting a pair of shoes that fits them. In good relationships, people will strive for equity.
When I went on a first date with a man who spent most of the time boasting about his sports car and travels, it confused me when he wanted to split the bill. Curiously, it is often these privileged men that have declared to my friends and I: Im a feminist, so well split it
Whether or not men believe womens labour is underpaid, it is. Further, whether or not men agree with women being underpaid, they directly benefit from it.
This isnt to say that men dont work hard or should always pay – when Ive been in situations where it is obvious that I have more income than the man Im dating, I am happy to split or cover the bill.
If I sense that a man correlates his paying for a first date with me owing him in some way, I will insist on paying for both of us and shut down any chance of further communication. This kind of primitive thinking shows a lack of perspective, respect, and consent.
I have dated both men and women, and funnily enough, anytime Ive dated a woman, or gender-diverse person weve ended up competing to pay the bill.
Ive been with my partner, Zac, for over a year now. I had a good feeling about him when he told me he loved animals, described his appreciation for his friends, and shared his views about labour rights. He paid for our first date and I paid for our second.
Now, we share expenses based on what we can afford when we go out together or visit each others homes. This might change in the future, but weve found a balance that works for both of us. Our most important goal is to make sure that both of us feel respected and that neither of us feel underappreciated or taken advantage of.
First dates are one small opportunity to recognise that people in society have different access to resources. If we want to be good company and good partners, challenging power imbalances is an important part of every relationship.
Who pays on a first date doesnt define the terms of the relationship.
As bonds develop, the people involved can work to find terms that suit them. Regardless of the expectations we might have about who should (or shouldnt) pay on a first date, its always good to be considerate.
BBC 100 Womennames 100 influential and inspirational women around the world every year and shares their stories.
Its been a momentous year for womens rights around the globe, so in 2018 BBC 100 Women will reflect the trailblazing women who are using passion, indignation and anger to spark real change in the world around them.
Chelsea Clinton: No-one asked dad to change his name
Ditch the witch: Julia Gillard shocked by vile abuse
The woman who draws other peoples Tinder dates
Are swipe left dating apps bad for our mental health?
Hot or not: Does rating yourself highly get you more dates?
The children growing up in a motherless village
The island leader who made a deal with the devil
Should this cross be removed from public land?
Title battle in Premier League caps astonishing season
Your pictures on the theme of rivers and streams